Saturday, 18 July 2009
Friday, 17 July 2009
Ashley Dobia Mwanza
Could the Lisbon treaty be facing a second round ‘bashing’? Could we be facing more protests? The country’s largest public-service trade union IMPACT was quick to point out that the Government should ignore the recommendation contained in the McCarthy report published yesterday. It's cuts all the way, totalling €5,3 billion.
It is those who are living on welfare payouts who will have a lot to say, they are the most vulnerable and hradest hit too.The timing of the publication was no doubt mistimed, "Bord Snip Nua" recommended that government should cut Social Welfare payments, it had been rumoured that the government won't announce that until after the Lisbon Referendum because they won't want 400 thousand voting against Lisbon on a protest vote. Well what now? Yes it’s not the government that made the announcement but it’s a publication of possibilities. The media has been singing that Ireland is up the creek without a paddle from our Taoiseach, and then now this. On the streets some who are surviving on welfare payouts made their anger felt by talking about it openly and bemoaning what they called the ‘ludicrous’ government.
“Given the continuing fall in prices, the report says the general cut in social welfare allowances would bring the value of payments back to the level seen in the summer 2008,” Irish Times.
However, many of the recommendations of the McCarthy Committee will impact on the poor.
“The committee will,” Mr Lenihan said in the Irish Times, “be able to hear the opinions of all those affected by the independent report’s recommendations.” The one thing about this committee is that it is not independent. According to Paul Sweeny, it was carefully selected by the Mandarins in Finance (who should have undertaken the work themselves… though one can see the advantage of outsourcing the manufacture of bitter pills), because all of its members are very conservative. As Vincent Browne has repeatedly said, none of them have a record of the promotion of equality or equity. So it will hear, but it does not have to listen.
At first reading, there is one major criticism of the report. First, is the lack of an economic analysis of the impact of the report. This is particularly surprising from a report chaired by an economist. The reason there was no economic analysis of the impact of the report is that the extent of the proposals are so potentially deflationary that it may lead to a downward spiral in economic activity, delaying economic growth for some time.
It’s interesting to see where we go from here...
Wednesday, 15 July 2009
Detachment in our world today
Ashley D. Mwanza
There can be no personal transformation without detachment. But what does that mean for us today?
Having read on this subject in the book Jesus Today by Albert Nolan. It really got me thinking. Detachment is not a popular word today. It seems to imply aloofness and indifference. When we accuse someone of being detached, we usually mean that person lacks feeling or passion for something or somebody. This is a world normally used to describe our politicians. But that is not what the word means in the many spiritual traditions that make use of it. Detachment properly understood, means freedom, inner freedom.
Although it is not a word that Jesus used, detachment expresses very well an important element in his spirituality: the ability to let go. We can speak of this as “purity of heart” or as the process of becoming “poor in spirit.”
Meister Eckhart, described detachment as been more fundamental than love itself, because without freedom from our attachments we cannot love fully and unconditionally. We are not free to love until we are willing to stop clinging to our possessions of one kind or another. Otherwise, like the rich young man (Mk 10:17-22), our love and our commitment will always be impeded.
Our egos chain us down with a multitude of attachments. Our egos cling desperately to things, people, to times and places, to reputation and image, to professions and ministries, to our ideas and practices, to success and life itself. These are our chains. We need to take a closer look at them.
2 comments: